The Cost of Net Zero: A Luxury Belief Europe, Canada, and Australia Cannot Afford

A fiery speech has recently surfaced, highlighting the devastating consequences of the Net Zero agenda on Western economies. Delivered by Paul Marshall at the ARC Conference on February 18, 2025, the talk dissects the rapid pursuit of decarbonization, pointing out that while countries such as Britain, Germany, Canada, and Australia rush towards climate targets, they are, in reality, sacrificing their economic security, industrial bases, and ultimately, their people’s livelihoods.

Watch the Full Speech: How European Net Zero is Economic Suicide (And Empowering China) | Paul Marshall

Credit: Alliance for Responsible Citizenship for posting the video from the ARC Conference.

Go deeper with ARC Research. Read reports, articles, and academic papers underneath our talks – all pointed towards advancing education, promoting research, and developing ideas about the keys to human flourishing and prosperity.
Explore ARC Research

The Illusion of Net Zero Leadership

The UK has boasted of reducing its carbon emissions by over 50% since 1990, leading the G20 in emissions reduction. However, this victory comes at an immense cost: energy security, industrial stability, and economic prosperity. Britain is now “leading the way” in shutting down reliable energy sources, destroying its rural landscapes, and making energy unaffordable for the average citizen.

This is not a party-political issue; both Conservative and Labour governments have pushed the Net Zero agenda. Nor is it a debate over climate science—one does not need to deny climate change to see the disastrous impact of Net Zero policies. The problem lies in the reckless zeal with which these policies are being implemented, ignoring the economic and societal trade-offs.

A Global Divide: Who Is Really Committed to Net Zero?

While European nations have committed to Net Zero by 2050 (with Scandinavia aiming for even earlier), China, India, and Saudi Arabia have set deadlines decades later—2060 and 2070. This conveniently allows them to continue expanding their economies while Western nations self-impose extreme restrictions.

China alone has over 1,161 coal-fired power plants and is building two new plants per week. India has 285 coal plants and is accelerating its coal consumption. Meanwhile, the US, which initially championed climate alarmism through figures like Al Gore, has never ceased drilling. Now, as other Western countries tighten their energy policies, the US is stepping back, ensuring its own energy independence while watching its economic rivals self-sabotage.

Europe’s Self-Destruction: The High Cost of Energy

Germany, once an industrial powerhouse, abandoned nuclear energy under Angela Merkel, leaving itself dependent on Russian gas and intermittent wind power. Following the Ukraine crisis, Germany now relies on expensive imports of US and Qatari gas. As a result, energy costs in Germany have skyrocketed, damaging its heavy industries.

The UK is faring no better. Once deriving over 25% of its electricity from nuclear energy, Britain now has only five remaining plants—four of which are slated for closure within five years. Despite having 35 years’ worth of gas reserves in the North Sea, Britain has refused to grant new oil and gas licenses since 2019, actively imposing windfall taxes on its own energy producers.

The Mirage of Renewable Energy

Renewables such as wind and solar are not inherently bad, but they come with significant limitations. German wind power, much like British wind, is unreliable. Periods of low wind, known in Germany as Dunkelflaute, can last up to two weeks, necessitating backup from gas and coal-fired plants. The current solutions—batteries and hydrogen storage—are far from being viable replacements for base-load energy production.

And yet, Britain’s response is to build a billion solar panels, despite having some of the lowest levels of sunshine in the world, second only to Ireland. The result? Higher energy costs for consumers, an obliteration of the manufacturing sector, and increased reliance on imported goods and energy from foreign suppliers.

The Exodus of Industry

Britain and Germany are rapidly losing their industrial base. The British steel industry is collapsing, with the last blast furnaces set to shut down this year. One-third of the UK’s chemical industry has vanished in the past four years. Jim Ratcliffe, Britain’s largest independent chemical manufacturer, has announced plans to move his company, Ineos, to the US, where energy remains affordable.

The EU’s ban on internal combustion engine cars by 2035, with Britain aiming for 2030, is another example of self-destruction. The European automotive industry employs nearly 14 million people; the UK car industry employs 83,000. How many of those jobs will still exist in five years?

The Reality of Net Zero: A Luxury Belief for the Wealthy, a Nightmare for the Poor

Paul Marshall encapsulated the crisis in his speech:

“What I'm describing is a European problem and a Canadian problem and an Australian problem. These countries have been infected by an ideological zeal which is leading us to sacrifice our economic prosperity and our people's livelihoods all for the sake of making some fractional changes in the levels of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere.”

Policymakers continue to push extreme Net Zero policies without acknowledging the economic trade-offs. Renewable subsidies and global climate aid divert funding from essential services, while rising energy costs crush small businesses and low-income families.

Britain and Germany have become the “patsies” of Net Zero, engaging in what can only be described as unilateral economic disarmament. While the EU and the UK penalize their own industries, the US, China, and India reap the benefits, securing their economic futures.

Energy security and industrial stability are the bedrock of prosperity. The US, the Gulf nations, and China understand this. The question now is whether Europe, Australia, and Canada will wake up before their economic foundations crumble entirely.

Conclusion: Time to Reconsider the Path

It is not too late to course-correct. A pragmatic approach to energy—one that balances sustainability with economic viability—is possible. But first, Western leaders must recognize the self-inflicted wounds of the current trajectory. Without an urgent reassessment of Net Zero policies, nations will continue their downward spiral into economic decline, sacrificing their industries and citizens’ well-being on the altar of ideological fervor.

Net Zero is a policy gamble with catastrophic stakes. The question remains: how long before the West realizes it is losing the bet?