1 Comment

Maggie:

I love Cheryl Gallant!

Excellent info!

Sincerely,

Ron Devereux

*****

My Response to your e-mail:

1. LINK #1>https://co2coalition.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/2023-02-23-E-Challenging-Net-Zero-with-Science.pdf

The Executive Summary details the main points of this lengthy document.

CONCLUSION:

The adoption of Net Zero is the rejection of overwhelming scientific evidence

that there is no risk of catastrophic global warming caused by fossil fuels and CO2.

Net Zero, then, violates the tenets of the scientific method that for more than 300 years

has underpinned the advancement of western civilization.

2. LINK #2> https://www.fraserinstitute.org/studies/canadas-path-net-zero-2050-darkness-end-tunnel

The Executive Summary details the main points of this lengthy document.

CONCLUSION:

Canada is unlikely to reach Net Zero by 2050. Even the most efficient policies impose unsustainable costs, making them unlikely to gain public support.

*****

SO...ANY time, effort and money that ANY GOVERNMENT spends on

reducing carbon dioxide, is for no measurable environmental benefits

that will stop Climate Change!

So why is the United Nations preaching to reduce it???

BECAUSE IT'S a SCAM...that more than a decade ago,

United Nations officials admitted the purpose is:

QUOTE:

to redistribute…

de facto…the world's wealth by climate policy.

One has to free oneself from the illusion that international climate policy

is environmental policy.

This has almost nothing to do with environmental policy anymore."

END QUOTE.

*****

When they say it in their own words...from their own mouth...

IT'S NOT A CONSPIRACY THEORY!!

Expand full comment