Thanks for picking up on this Maggie. It seems the letter writing worked, and a 'stay of execution' was forthcoming. . . people don't like writing letters, but it is still effect. I also included, in a note to Karen, that any PCR test should be accompanied with the number of cycles used. Anything 20cycles and above was not considered adequate (and not accepted) for academic papers, because these results are basically garbage. Cycles of 35 to 45 (as used here in Ontario during the Plandemic) are a joke, therefore (or would be, if it weren't so sad - and totally corrupt). At these cycles, 'bought-and-paid-for' technicians find anything the 'Agenda' requires them to find. . . the number of cycles must always be requested if a PCR machine is involved. This is a lesson that we absolutely have to learn now, or we will have bigger problems in the future. This kind of 'culling' of course, has everything to do with the UN's so-called 'One Health' and (now the hopefully dead) Bill C-293 (Nathaniel Erskine-Smith's suppose proposed 'Pandemic Preparedness Bill"). Thanks for everything you're doing, David
Thanks for picking up on this Maggie. It seems the letter writing worked, and a 'stay of execution' was forthcoming. . . people don't like writing letters, but it is still effect. I also included, in a note to Karen, that any PCR test should be accompanied with the number of cycles used. Anything 20cycles and above was not considered adequate (and not accepted) for academic papers, because these results are basically garbage. Cycles of 35 to 45 (as used here in Ontario during the Plandemic) are a joke, therefore (or would be, if it weren't so sad - and totally corrupt). At these cycles, 'bought-and-paid-for' technicians find anything the 'Agenda' requires them to find. . . the number of cycles must always be requested if a PCR machine is involved. This is a lesson that we absolutely have to learn now, or we will have bigger problems in the future. This kind of 'culling' of course, has everything to do with the UN's so-called 'One Health' and (now the hopefully dead) Bill C-293 (Nathaniel Erskine-Smith's suppose proposed 'Pandemic Preparedness Bill"). Thanks for everything you're doing, David